Author: Omid David
Date: 03:24:24 08/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2002 at 20:02:59, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 30, 2002 at 18:42:40, Omid David wrote: > >>Right on the other side, stands Ernst Heinz, which has published extensive >>*practical* research, working on different "read world"(!) issues (e.g. >>null-move pruning, futility pruning, etc). But Heinz's work was mostly >>applicable for chess only, while Plaat worked also on Checkers and Othello >>(something I don't plan to do!). > >Heinz's testing was also of just 'academical level', mind you. There is a sometimes an unbridgable gap between academic research and practice; Heinz's work was the closest one to a practical level. > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.