Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 11:57:07 08/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 2002 at 10:27:19, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 31, 2002 at 09:56:52, Joachim Rang wrote: >>nice test, but 20 games say nothing. Play at least 100 or 200 games. Then on can >>estimates the influence of book. > >1)The result is 12-7 if you adjudicate >loss on time correctly. > >2)It is more easy to suggest other to play 100 or 200 >games. > you are right ;-) >From looking in the games I do not consider book as >very important. > >My opinion is that if book could beat no book only 12-7 then book is expected >to get even worse result against a small book only to get >the opponent out of book. where is the logic? Sorry i can't find the logic in this assumption. If you have a small book only to get the opponent out of book, the chances should be equal if you succeed and better for the bookengine if not.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.