Author: Paul
Date: 04:34:16 09/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 2002 at 13:26:16, leonid wrote: >On August 31, 2002 at 08:15:19, Paul wrote: > >>On August 31, 2002 at 06:41:28, leonid wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>This position is very easy to solve. At least for black side where mate have >>>accessible parameters and mate is 10 moves deep. >>> >>>[D]3Nqbbk/3NQqRq/3QrRp1/3Pqp2/3Qqn2/2p1Pn2/1r2Pp2/QNKBBQ2 w - - >>> >>>Please indicate Your result. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Leonid. >> >>Hi Leonid, > >Hi, Paul! > >>My Pretz on a P3/1000 says a mate in 12 in 9 secs for White: > >Excellent time! Probably You speeded even more Your program. > >Mine for whites found also mate in 12. There I don't know shortest mate, since >for white side my branching was not very glorious. I tried Chest after I posted, and after 8219 seconds in the background, on low priority, it reported 'no mate in 11' ... so 12 it is ... >>00:09 WM12 09 Nxf7+ Qxf7 Rxh7+ Kxh7 Rxf7+ Bxf7 Qxf7+ Kh6 Qh1+ Nh5 Qdxf8+ Kg5 >>Qd8+ Rf6 Qdxf6+ Nxf6 Qxf6+ Qxf6 Qxf6+ Kg4 Qg2+ Kh5 Qgxg6# >> >>For Black it's a little shorter and faster: > >It could be that our programs were indentical, or close for both colors. Mine, >on my Celeron 600Mhz and no hash, for white took 13 seconds. For black side it >took 0.38 sec. Well, your black time is 3 times as fast as mine :) >Did You worked with Your program since I spoke with You last time, or You was >"out of town" like me? I sent you an email ... >Cheers, >Leonid. > >>00:01 BM10 08 Rxb1+ Qxb1 Qxe3+ Bd2 cxd2+ Kc2 Ne1+ Qxe1 fxe1=N+ Kb2 Q5xd4+ Ka2 >>Qa7+ Ba4 Qxa4+ Qa3 Qaxa3+ Qxa3 Qxa3# Groetjes, Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.