Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:13:12 09/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2002 at 09:26:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 01, 2002 at 09:21:12, Uri Blass wrote: > >look how silly deep blue played. It would have nailed itself everywhere. >Note that completely forgotten is the draw schach-deepblue 1995. >Also a horrible game. Of course a horrible game. most games were >ended by major blunders. Like that c4 move DB played :) > >Reasons are not improtant simply. No one asks why i lost from junior in 2002 >either, from a dead drawn position. it was a similar stupid problem. There _is_ one huge difference. No one is going around claiming _your_ program has a horribly naive evaluation. Or a horribly inefficient search. Mostly without knowing what they are talking about, of course... > >>On September 01, 2002 at 09:12:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On September 01, 2002 at 03:11:06, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>Comon that's a beginners judgement. Black is having an excellent >>>position already. >> >>I also prefer black's position after 0-0 but I believe that they could win or >>draw the game against Fritz3 without c4. >> >>I analyzed the position at that time for hours with computers and >>I did not find a forced win for black after f3 or g3 >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.