Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: developing Junior (and other pro programs)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 22:22:38 09/02/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 02, 2002 at 19:29:17, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On September 02, 2002 at 17:15:54, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>
>>On September 01, 2002 at 13:26:44, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On September 01, 2002 at 09:40:34, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>
>>>>pawn=32 in fritz seemingly. that's all you need to know to consider
>>>>it works for it.
>>>
>>>What does that do?  I have seen large positional scores out of fritz,
>>>which suggests (to me) that mtd(f) could cause some problems...
>>
>>It means there's a lower granularity of values, so less (re-)searches are
>>required to arrive at the score.  I have believed for some time that this is a
>>correct decision, because I don't have confidence in the precision of even
>>centipawn evaluations (much less the millipawn evaluations that Diep years ago
>>when Vincent based mtd techniques heavily).  I didn't know that Fritz actually
>>had done it, though.
>>
>>The range of positional scores is relevant for lazy evaluation schemes, but I
>>think that issue is pretty well handled by Don Dailey's recommendation.
>>
>>Dave
>
>
>I understand that.  But that wasn't the issue I was addressing.  It was "fritz
>uses a paw value of 32 or whatever..."  And I don't see how that influences
>mtd(f) as much as an evaluation that produces positional scores that vary from
>+3.00 to -3.00, no matter what 1.00 means.  If an evaluation can produce wild
>positional scores, then mtd(f) causes problems...  It makes it hard to hone in
>on the right final score, particularly with lazy eval..

I do not know if Fritz is using lazy evaluation and there are alternatives to
lazy evaluation like incremental evaluation.

You also assume that lazy evaluation is based only on material and can be
significantly different than the full evaluation.

It is not clear for me and lazy evaluation can be an estimate for the real
evaluation with difference of at most a pawn.

Big positional factors may be evaluated also in lazy evaluation.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.