Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 01:54:30 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2002 at 17:49:35, Chessfun wrote: >On September 02, 2002 at 17:38:12, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On September 02, 2002 at 17:16:53, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>Individual statistics: >>>(1) Tiger 15 normal style : 192 (+ 71,= 85,- 36), 59.1 % >>> >>>Deep Fritz : 20 (+ 7,= 7,- 6), 52.5 % >>>Junior 6a : 10 (+ 3,= 4,- 3), 50.0 % >>>Chess Tiger 14.0 : 20 (+ 10,= 6,- 4), 65.0 % >>>Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 20 (+ 8,= 11,- 1), 67.5 % >>>Junior 7 : 20 (+ 12,= 5,- 3), 72.5 % >>>Fritz 7 001 : 20 (+ 6,= 10,- 4), 55.0 % >>>Fritz 7 008 : 8 (+ 3,= 4,- 1), 62.5 % >>>Shredder 6 : 9 (+ 3,= 4,- 2), 55.6 % >>>Hiarcs 8 : 20 (+ 5,= 12,- 3), 55.0 % >>>Shredder Paderborn : 20 (+ 5,= 9,- 6), 47.5 % >>>Crafty 18.15 : 6 (+ 4,= 1,- 1), 75.0 % >>>Deep Fritz 7 : 19 (+ 5,= 12,- 2), 57.9 % >> >> >>Interesting how Tiger 15 absolutely crushes the two previous Tigers (combined >>score of 18 wins, 5 losses, and 17 draws)! It also impressively demolishes >>Junior 7. >> >>Against Deep Fritz 6, Shredder Paderborn, and Junior 6a, its total record so far >>is a more modest 15 wins, 15 losses, and 20 draws. I have a feeling that with >>time this will improve. > >Actually and naturally others had different scores. I don't remember all others >but remember we had some conversations on Junior 6a. I know others had better >scores against it, likely worse against the Tiger's I don't recall. These are >simply the results I myself got. > >Sarah. I have a form of Alexander1 which mostlikely will be close too Tiger 15 And looking and the scores and this Alexander games i think it has become more Tactical but had to pay for it by being also less positional. Am I right? Or would this be an improved engine version. the trick is i found out Tiger is smart. Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.