Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 04:24:54 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2002 at 22:57:45, Mark Young wrote: >http://www.rebel.nl/lokasoft.htm > >I wish you well Ed. I prefered to see the creation of a certain class in CC. When Paul Onstad died with whom I had exchanged a few interesting notes on RGCC (after Sept 11, when I participated mainly out of emotional reasons), I saw how small the human factor is viewed in CC. Ed Schroder by far isn't dead yet, but still, I can't discover any good commentary from those who usually give us _their_ interpretation of reality. The question isn't part of CTF _at all_. Usually I read a lot of "we" and "us", but we all must confess that if we'd lose a family member we'd "mourn" much more. Are we immature gamblers or is CC a hell of DARWIN's jungle/ playground? It must be very depressing for Ed, but also for some observers, because Ed wasn't exactly famous for being the unemotional robot but a highly sensitive man out of flesh, blood, in sum, many emotions. Neither for Paul nor Ed, who's still alive, I read something from the big names. I wished that CCC had the wisdom to establish a culture for the human aspect. In truth if we mourn we go through a necessary catharsis, we don't do it primarily for those who have gone. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.