Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 05:06:29 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2002 at 07:41:57, pavel wrote: >On September 03, 2002 at 07:24:54, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On September 02, 2002 at 22:57:45, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>http://www.rebel.nl/lokasoft.htm >>> >>>I wish you well Ed. >> >>I prefered to see the creation of a certain class in CC. >>When Paul Onstad died with whom I had exchanged a few >>interesting notes on RGCC (after Sept 11, when I >>participated mainly out of emotional reasons), I >>saw how small the human factor is viewed in CC. >>Ed Schroder by far isn't dead yet, but still, >>I can't discover any good commentary from those who >>usually give us _their_ interpretation of reality. >>The question isn't part of CTF _at all_. >>Usually I read a lot of "we" and "us", but we all must >>confess that if we'd lose a family member we'd "mourn" >>much more. >> >>Are we immature gamblers or is CC a hell of DARWIN's >>jungle/ playground? >> >>It must be very depressing for Ed, but also for some >>observers, because Ed wasn't exactly famous for being >>the unemotional robot but a highly sensitive man out >>of flesh, blood, in sum, many emotions. Neither for >>Paul nor Ed, who's still alive, I read something >>from the big names. >> >>I wished that CCC had the wisdom to establish a culture >>for the human aspect. In truth if we mourn we go through >>a necessary catharsis, we don't do it primarily for >>those who have gone. >> >>Rolf Tueschen > >I don't understand what you are expecting. That is thepoint. >It's a very sad thing, but it's also a very odd time when the post was posted. >Which means major posters didn't logon to see the post or react/comment on it. >(Odd time for most US posters) Please elaborate the case of Paul. He died on July 5th.... These are months not hours. > >Ed will obviously be missed as a developer of Rebel. (which has been mentioned >by Ed himself about 6 months ago in this forum and have been discussed at great >length by many posters) >However, there is no indication, that he will stop contributing in this forum or >anything. Objection. You argue similar to the Germans who told their readers that Ed had completely retired for a while from CCC too etc. But that he would come back. In reality he was posting day by day in CTF about all topics except CC. Isn't it strange? Are we unable to see what is reality? And why is it what it is? > > >I never bought any Rebel product only because they were DOS, however I have deep >respect for him, and I am looking forward to buy RebelXP. > >If this decision makes him happy, I am happy. >I am happy to see him happy. If something wouldn't fit here, would you reorganize your perception? There is a contradiction in your arguments. Rolf Tueschen > >cheers, >pavs ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.