Author: Omid David
Date: 05:07:30 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2002 at 05:42:31, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: >On September 03, 2002 at 05:16:08, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 03, 2002 at 04:56:16, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: >> >>> >>>What do we have: >>> >>>Match 1 >>>Winner Braingame match - Winner CC qualify-match >>> >>>Match 2 >>>Loser Braingame match - Loser CC qualify-match >>> >>>Match 2 runs before match 1 as normal when competing for 3-4 places >>> >>> >>>If match 2 attract more attention there is only one factor: Kasparov >>>All other things are too techncal. >> >>No >> >>Match 2 is between the human player with the highest rating(better than kramnik) >>against the program that won the last computer championship when Fritz was one >>of the participants. >> >>You can look at match 1 as the match of the losers. >> >>Uri > >:) > >I repeat: >If match 2 attract more attention there is only one factor: Kasparov I can't argue with the fact that Kasparov is the main reason of interest for the K-DJ match. But besides that, there are plenty of other reasons (as Uri mentioned) for justifying why K-DJ is and has to be more important. In addition, the Jerusalem match is sponsored and endorsed by FIDE and ICCA, the highest chess and computer chess organizations; in the contrary, K-DF's match is a "losers" match in a forgotten place, sponsored by oil-millionaires... >All other things are too techncal. > >As far as the cc players come I would guess Fritz is more popular among people >than Junior so it would drag the pendulum towards match 1. >But they are both sons of DB in this revenge try. > >Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.