Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:55:01 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2002 at 15:04:07, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 03, 2002 at 14:57:58, Dana Turnmire wrote: > >>"We talk about mass fraud here." >> >>Would you explain in laymen's terms what you are talking about and what the >>purpose would be for Mr. Hyatt to be lying? I'm sure many here aren't that >>knowledgable about programming. > >I cannot speak for Bob, but i know that in science there is so much >fraud with 'scientific results' that you have basically 3 choices > a) lie even harder > b) get an email box filled with hatemail being honest > c) modify the conditions of your test such that your outputs look > great but only very big experts see that it wasn't that good > >It is sad but true that with regard to computerchess most opt for either >'a' or 'c'. Vincent, speak for yourself. I _publish_ my source code. Which makes it very hard to fake data with Crafty, for example. You don't. So you can claim anything you want, safely. I don't have that option, nor would I do so if I could...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.