Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 14:24:53 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2002 at 17:21:54, pavel wrote: >Maybe I am ignorant, but I fail to see how this is a "fraud"? >You have called it a fraud, quite a few times throughout the thread. > >Too harshly put? The data is presented as raw logo data. It's clearly is not. Thoughout this thread, Robert already has admitted it's not and that it was processed with a very unclear method. It is already very hazy to not mention this in the article. As far as I am concerned, this completely voids the articles results, and the burden of proof that they are true is on Robert. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.