Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: DTS article robert hyatt - revealing his bad math

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 14:30:00 09/03/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 03, 2002 at 17:11:14, Peter Berger wrote:

>On September 03, 2002 at 16:08:56, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On September 03, 2002 at 14:22:05, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On September 03, 2002 at 13:51:52, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>It is about the second digit being round, because
>>>that makes the chance you have such a speedup 1/10 of
>>>a chance.
>>>
>>>Bob claims a 2.0 speedup which bob claims according to
>>>his paper based upon counting up all times then dividing
>>>by total times.
>>>
>>>However if we look at every speedup individually then
>>>if you get a 2.0 speedup that's in a range of 1.95-2.04
>>>RIGHT?
>>
>>Maybe or maybe not.  I believe all those numbers were integers.  And
>>I very likely did the normal integer round-up so that numbers > 1.90
>>would become 2.0.  I really don't remember now...
>>
>
>I think this post might get missed in the jungle by accident but it shouldn't -
>so I add an offbeat random answer :).
>This was my first thought looking at the data - and it is the most logical
>explanation by far IMHO.  If needed - this could also be thought of as a flaw in
>the original publication btw , much more reasonable than believing the data
>itself is flawed I think.
>
>Regards,
>Peter

please look at my post

http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?249532

The time in seconds does not make sense because when I divide I get always 0 in
the second digit after the . and in most cases I get even 0 in the third digit
after the .

I checked now by calculator and the 1.90 or 1.80 or 1.70 is in most cases 1.700
or 1.800 or 1.900

It does not make sense to get always speed up of 2 or 1.90.. or 1.80.. or 1.70..

It does not mean that Robert Hyatt cheated and it is possible that the people
who were responsible for the test(not hyatt) were too lazy to get output and
analyze it so they prefer to cheat.

Maybe there is another explanation but the data as it is does not make sense.


Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.