Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: More on the "bad math" after an important email...

Author: Eugene Nalimov

Date: 15:24:20 09/03/02

Go up one level in this thread


I believe that speedup table is what count here. And it is geniune.

And there *is* way to obtain anyone's Ph.D. thesis in the USA, and Bob mentioned
it several days ago.

BTW, I don't see why majority of code in CopyToSMP() should be done under lock.
All that should be done under lock is the assignment "c->used=1;". After that
you should release the lock. I would not be surprised if it'll speed up the
search with many (>= 16) CPUs.

Personally, I'd replaced loops that copy data by memcpy() calls where possible.
That's not Fortran, and compiler should generate the code that works for the
memory-aliased case; by using memcpy() instead of loop you are telling the
compiler that there are no aliases.

And of course "used" should be declared "volatile". [Bob, do you read that]?

Thanks,
Eugene

On September 03, 2002 at 18:03:14, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>However reasonable your explanations may be, the gist of your DTS article
>and the most important thing for comparison were the speedup numbers. After
>what we discovered and what you just posted, it is clear that they are
>based on very shaky foundations.
>
>What's far worse, until you were directly accused, there was no indication
>whatsoever for all the fiddling that was done with the auxiliary data. When
>you were accused, you denied again, until other people supported Vincent's
>point of view, when you suddenly got an email from an unknown person you're
>not willing to disclose that 'refreshed your memory'.
>
>Additionally, the only other thing to support DTS, you PhD thesis, appears
>to be basically totally unfindable for third parties.
>
>I hope you realize that a request from you to trust your numbers isn't
>very convincing. In fact, with what we know now, I'm pretty sure the
>article would never have gotten published in the first place.
>
>If Vincent wanted to discredit your results, then as far as I'm concerned,
>he's succeeded 100%.
>
>--
>GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.