Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 15:41:11 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2002 at 18:07:20, Marc van Hal wrote:
>On September 03, 2002 at 11:02:03, Georg Langrath wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>Still i think free advertising doesn't belong in this forum.
>>>Marc
>>
>>
>>Could you explain?
>>
>>If I like a chessprogram and express that, is that advertising? May I only
>>express if I dislike it? Many members in this forum have written what they liked
>>or disliked with chessprograms in this forum. I think that this is one of the
>>main purposes with this forum.
>>
>>Or did you mean that it is advertising that Christophe recommended a color
>>display to my Palm?
>>
>>I don't understand what you meant by your comment, no matter how I try.
>>
>>Georg
>both
>If i say something about a program i most of the time say what is good and what
>is bad about it saying it is good in everyway is advertising not an opinion .
>Because it is not treu
>Chesstiger for palm is much weaker then most pc programs it still is far from a
>perfect program etc.
>More i can't say because i don't know the program.
>noir do I own a palm computer.
>You must al know that I am not against any chessprogram but I am someone who
>keeps a high valeu on the treuth.
>Marc
The kind of stuff you have read about Chess Tiger for Palm is an OPINION.
That's exactly why (among other things) CCC has been created!
People come here and share their positive and negative opinions about the
programs every day. That's why the forum is there.
Are we supposed to delete every post saying that Fritz7 has a great chess
engine, that Shredder6 is excellent, that Junior7 has a real gift for positional
sacrifices and so on?
Anyway, if a post is lying about a product you can be sure that there will be
many answers correcting it.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.