Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 17:53:35 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2002 at 20:48:08, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 03, 2002 at 20:20:48, Roger D Davis wrote: > >>Wow, this comment is in exceptionally bad taste. You don't question the >>scientific integrity of a researcher lightly, particularly in a public forum. > >I was responding to this post from Robert: > >---quote---- > >[snip]... But that >doesn't mean things were fabricated. > >But if you want to believe so, feel free. It doesn't change a thing either >way... > >------------ > >I don't know what exactly happend with the results. It seems from this thread >that even Robert doesn't know. Just because of this, no matter how they were >produced, I think they are questionable. > >-- >GCP At least the presentation is questionable, this is what you could say! The rest depends... You and Vincent are making fast conclusions. Things are more complicated. Please try to get into a less aggressive communication with Bob. The observations as such are very valuable, no question. Rolf Tueschen Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.