Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: More on the "bad math" after an important email...

Author: Eugene Nalimov

Date: 19:03:41 09/03/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 03, 2002 at 20:13:00, Robert Hyatt wrote:

[... skipped ...]

>That is up to you to believe or not.  Doesn't matter to me.  Any more than
>it matters whether vincent thinks I can get a speedup > 1.4 on 2 cpus or not.
>What he _believes_ simply doesn't matter.  The _results_ matter...  And those
>I stand by, completely...

That 1.4x looks suspiciously close to 1.4x raw nps speedup I observed for Crafty
on the dual Athlon system. Guess what system Vincent uses himself if in several
CCC posts he mentioned "dual K7 system"?

Actually, today I measured Crafty's nps raw on another Athlon system in friend's
office. It was 1.41x. Of course that is better than 1.4x I reported earlier,
but...

Somebody here reported ~1.6x speedup for the dual Athlon, but that is still much
worse than 1.9x for dual PIII and 1.89x for dual P4.

Answering some question: "my" Athlon has Asus motherboard.

Thanks,
Eugene



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.