Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:56:44 09/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2002 at 03:31:19, Tony Werten wrote: >On September 03, 2002 at 18:03:14, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>However reasonable your explanations may be, the gist of your DTS article >>and the most important thing for comparison were the speedup numbers. After >>what we discovered and what you just posted, it is clear that they are >>based on very shaky foundations. > >I must be missing something. The only thing I see wrong with the speedup numbers >is the way they are calculated. > >Since time was measured in miliseconds ie 3 significant numbers after the dot, >the speedup should have been given in 3 significant numbers behind the dot as >well. This is not the only wrong thing. If we assume that the results are not a fake then it means that the correct times that the speed up are based on are not in the article. If you calculate speed up based on the time that are in the article you get always things like 2.00... 1.90... 1.80... or 1.70... In most of the cases it is even 1.700... or 1.800... Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.