Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 08:05:26 09/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
Good evening, >Excuse me. This is not sound! Although I don't know your age or education, talking about that I wondered about yours and read your profile. Where did you study math, physics and psychology, and in which years ? Also, I would appreciate if you could send me a copy of your ID-Card/Drivers license to georg.von.zimmermann@law-school.de . I just hate thinking I talk to a 58 years old well educated guy when in fact I am talking to a kid with fake identity. This is not meant as an insult, I am just curious. >I >know that you don't get the point here. NB that if you are a real scientist then >it's even worse. >[...] Of course he might have found certain errors in the >presentation of the article. I found many occasions to discuss with Bob namely >the OT topics. But Bob is still the one who was able to do some sound science, >aspect three. I dont know what NB means, or OT. And what is aspect 3 ? Much of the anger here might come from people not understanding Vincents rambling, or other train-of-thought messages like yours. >How can you state the trivial when Vincent himself, unneccessarily, confused >good observations with final proofs? Wouldn't you say that this is always evil? > He's in a mess and not a scientist (yet) himself. How do you define scientist ? Someone which a title ? A scientist in my definition is someone who, based on proven knowledge, tries to find new truth. And of course who has a certain knowledge about the field he is working in. Vincent fits those criteria, and not as a beginner. Georg v. Zimmermann
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.