Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:34:22 09/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2002 at 11:39:17, Marc van Hal wrote:
>On September 03, 2002 at 18:41:11, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On September 03, 2002 at 18:07:20, Marc van Hal wrote:
>>
>>>On September 03, 2002 at 11:02:03, Georg Langrath wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Still i think free advertising doesn't belong in this forum.
>>>>>Marc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Could you explain?
>>>>
>>>>If I like a chessprogram and express that, is that advertising? May I only
>>>>express if I dislike it? Many members in this forum have written what they liked
>>>>or disliked with chessprograms in this forum. I think that this is one of the
>>>>main purposes with this forum.
>>>>
>>>>Or did you mean that it is advertising that Christophe recommended a color
>>>>display to my Palm?
>>>>
>>>>I don't understand what you meant by your comment, no matter how I try.
>>>>
>>>>Georg
>>>both
>>>If i say something about a program i most of the time say what is good and what
>>>is bad about it saying it is good in everyway is advertising not an opinion .
>>>Because it is not treu
>>>Chesstiger for palm is much weaker then most pc programs it still is far from a
>>>perfect program etc.
>>>More i can't say because i don't know the program.
>>>noir do I own a palm computer.
>>>You must al know that I am not against any chessprogram but I am someone who
>>>keeps a high valeu on the treuth.
>>>Marc
>>
>>
>>
>>The kind of stuff you have read about Chess Tiger for Palm is an OPINION.
>>
>>That's exactly why (among other things) CCC has been created!
>>
>>People come here and share their positive and negative opinions about the
>>programs every day. That's why the forum is there.
>>
>>Are we supposed to delete every post saying that Fritz7 has a great chess
>>engine, that Shredder6 is excellent, that Junior7 has a real gift for positional
>>sacrifices and so on?
>>
>>Anyway, if a post is lying about a product you can be sure that there will be
>>many answers correcting it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>No one brought up the backdraws of the program so far
>And yes if you only say what Fritz7 or Shredder6 does well it gives a wrong idea
>of the program.
>Both are not verry good in endgames.
>If you want to believe Chessbase Shredder should be the best which is not the
>treuth.
>Junior7 tops on this but the evaluation of this program is set to risky
>which you can see better in Windows ME then Windows XP.
So you would advice to change the OS to get more playing strength?
Christophe
>And though Junior plays endgames prety well it manny times tries to avoid simple
>winning endgames.
>Simply only telling that the program is the greatest ever is in my opinion
>advertising.
>
>Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.