Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:50:45 09/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2002 at 14:43:54, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 04, 2002 at 12:03:38, Roger D Davis wrote: > >the accusation is backed up with loads of evidence and >a proof the chance it was a 'mistake' is less then >0.0000000000000000000000000000000001 > >First the human aspect was dealt with and that was a talk with >Bob. I have posted it already 4 times here what happened. > >So it is very relevant to accuse bob publicly, after he doing >such stupid statemetns everywhere on deep blue. it shows the >big picture. 9 out of 10 of his statements are based without >knowing that statistics proof something in science. > >Bob clearly doesn't know about it, as all his publications show. > >I focus upon this publication because this is the publication that >concerns me. I lack the time to analyze the other publications for you >but you will not like the outcome... Go for it. But read the thesis first so that you know what you are looking at... Hint :averages... Of course, you haven't made any significant points about the DTS paper either, other than to help me remember a bit about producing the tables. Didn't change one conclusion in the paper, nor the performance numbers that the paper presented... > >>Actually, we are talking about you, Vincent. WE ARE TALKING VERY MUCH ABOUT YOU. >>You have chosen to accuse someone of fraud in a public forum. This is far >>different in nature that simply saying that a mistake was make, or even saying >>that you don't respect someone's intelligence, or even saying that someone is >>stupid, because this goes to INTENTIONALITY and to character. Such accusations >>are not to be made lightly, particularly where the charge involved is scientific >>dishonesty. >> >>If you're going to make such severe charges, particularly in a public forum, >>then you have to accept the fact that others are going to inspect your motives >>in doing so. They are going to look at what interests you might be furthering by >>making such charges, they're going to look at your own level of maturity, and >>they're going to look at the history of the interaction between you and the >>person you've accused. >> >>That's just life. Science doesn't exist in a vacuum...science is just a part of >>life. >> >>So the spotlight is on you, too. We have a saying: If you can stand the heat, >>get out of the kitchen. >> >>Roger >> >> >> >>> >>>We are not talking about me here but about Hyatt. How important is it >>>that a professor of good standing is writing down the truth in an >>>official article he writes? >>> >>>I mean if you, just released from prison or madhouse, >>>to just give an example, write down some faked results and submit it >>>to ICCA and they post it, then i can understand if it is not getting >>>taken serious. >>> >>>Now how important is it that a government official with a professor >>>in front of his name is writing down the truth? >>>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.