Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:18:33 09/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2002 at 19:49:39, Slater Wold wrote: >On September 04, 2002 at 13:44:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: > > >>So? that was the rough speed on the C90. Is there a point in why that >>is "interesting"??? > >500k nps is the speed of Crafty on a P3 800mhz. Not exactly "super-computer" >caliber. > >Even the slowest of them all, HIARCS, get like 200k nps (average) on my computer >(1 cpu). If it was parallel, then 350k or so. > >I thought it was interesting, only because I thought a C90 would be a *lot* >faster. My guess would be, people probably thought the C90 @ 16 cpus was >hitting several million nps. Not for me. The T90 with 32 did about 7M. But we never played in a tournament with one of those... Don't forget, the C90 is now 13+ years old. Go back to 1990 and see how the PCs were doing. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.