Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:11:32 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 10:08:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 05, 2002 at 02:20:22, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On September 04, 2002 at 22:26:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On September 04, 2002 at 22:03:24, martin fierz wrote: >>> >>>>...or in the short version, 1.69 more nps for the 2-processor box. >>> >>> >>Totals so far: >> >>dual xeon 1700mhz 1.84X raw NPS >>quad xeon 700mhz 1.90X raw NPS (using only two processors) >>dual AMD 1730mhz 1.67X raw NPS >>dual cele 433mhz 1.86X raw NPS >>dual P3 450mhz 1.92X raw NPS > >different things get compared here. outputs without cleaning >hashtables are in this. That sucks ass. I didn't see any of those. I specifically asked them to make two different runs, which everyone I looked at did. So, as usual, I don't know what you are talking about. But you sure do jump to conclusions without looking at each post here where you would have noticed that they ran crafty two times, as can be seen for the ones I have checked...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.