Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 08:15:43 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 08:01:39, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 05, 2002 at 07:35:12, David Rasmussen wrote: > >>On September 05, 2002 at 04:20:24, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>Just notice for everyone. Ridderkerk 1. division is ended: >>> >>>WBEC Ridderkerk, 1st Division - 2nd edition. >>>DUAL-P3-1266 2002.06.21 - 2002.09.03 >>>PONDER ON!! >>> Score >>>------------------------------------ >>> 1: Yace 0.99.56 50.0 / 76 >>> 2: Comet B.46 44.5 / 76 >>> 3: Gromit 3.8.2 44.0 / 76 >>> 4: Pharaon 2.62 44.0 / 76 >>> 5: Nejmet 3.06 43.5 / 76 >>> 6: Quark 1.76 43.5 / 76 >>> 7: Pepito 1.53 42.0 / 76 >>> 8: Little Goliath 3.5 40.5 / 76 >>> 9: Crafty 18.15 40.0 / 76 >>>10: AnMon 5.21 38.0 / 76 >>>11: SOS 99.11.03 37.5 / 76 >>>12: Amy 0.7 37.5 / 76 >>>13: GreenLightCh 2.18 37.0 / 76 >>>14: Amyan 1.531 34.0 / 76 >>>15: TheCrazyBishop 0045 33.5 / 76 >>>16: Phalanx XXII 32.5 / 76 >>>17: Francesca MAD 0.06 31.5 / 76 >>>18: Leila 0.53h 30.0 / 76 >> >>I don't know how reliable this tournament is. Chezzz is consistently better on >>ICC against a number of the opponents that are above it in this tournament. > >Who are the opponents and what is the hardware? > >ICC has different time control and it does not use x minutes/y moves time >control. >ICC also does not use the same hardware for all players. > >I expect Chezzz to get better ranking than Ant and Averno in the end of this >tournament so I guess that it is going to be number 9. > >Chezzz already has more % than Ant and Ant is above Chezzz only because of >playing more games. > >Averno still needs to play against Resp so the result of Chezzz is better than >Averno. > >Uri Disregarding the 3rd division altogether, as all games haven't been played, I can say that Chezzz has an at least equal score with 2nd division engines such as Arasan, Exchess and Sjeng. WildCat, Delfi, SmarThink and WBQueen, Chezzz haven't even played against, I think. I'm not saying that the tournament is necesarily unreliable, and I know that chess strength isn't transitive, A can beat B, and B can beat C, but C may beat A. Still, my feeling is that Chezzz is roughly equal in strength to the lower end of 2nd division. I don't know how Leo setup Chezzz for the tournament. /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.