Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:24:34 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 12:52:06, Volker Pittlik wrote: >On September 05, 2002 at 11:07:38, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >... >> >>He ran the test wrong. It won't affect the NPS much, however, as >>we are not measuring SMP speedup, but simply raw NPS speedup, to >>address your ridiculous claim about smp vs non-smp crafty. >... > >Sorry, I've restarted Crafty every time. My logfiles show the same thing every >time. But this is possibly another problem what is not important in this debate. >Just ignore my results. > >Volker OK... your output looked like you first ran with mt=1, then did a "new" and "mt=2" and ran again. If you edited what you sent, then that would explain this. Personally, I don't think it is a big deal either way as we are not measuring hashing or anything else, just raw NPS. If you restarted between the two runs, then your data belongs in the total. I will try to re-read all the posts this afternoon and post a new summary. > >... > >>>>> clearing hash tables >>>>> time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) >>>>> nss depth time score variation (1) >>>>> 8-> 0.80 -0.63 1. ... Bxe4 2. Bxe4 <HT> //*I have no idea why
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.