Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:47:24 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 08:26:56, pavel wrote: >On September 05, 2002 at 07:35:12, David Rasmussen wrote: >>I don't know how reliable this tournament is. Chezzz is consistently better on >>ICC against a number of the opponents that are above it in this tournament. >> >>/David > > >No offense to SSDF, but I consider this tournament to be more reliable than >SSDF. >If you look at the format of the tournament and the rules, and the way they are >being played out. > >Only handicap is that, not alot of games are played by each programs in each >division. >But it's still better than differant programs playing "differant numbers of >games" in a rating list. I don't see a problem with that approach, as long as enough games are played. When the number of games for some program is small, then the error bars will be large. >However, this is not a rating list, this is a tournament. > >cheers, >pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.