Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: benchmark test for fun (and for Vincent) , that means *1.862 Speedup

Author: Volker Pittlik

Date: 13:32:24 09/05/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 05, 2002 at 13:24:34, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On September 05, 2002 at 12:52:06, Volker Pittlik wrote:
>
>>On September 05, 2002 at 11:07:38, Robert Hyatt wrote:

...
>
>OK... your output looked like you first ran with mt=1, then did a
>"new" and "mt=2" and ran again.  If you edited what you sent, then that
>would explain this.

I ran the test several times because I wondered to find

>>>>>>  8->   0.80  -0.63   1. ... Bxe4 2. Bxe4 <HT>

as the first output in the log. Therefore I start a new game playing some stupid
moves like 1.Na3... 2.Nh3 to kick crafty out of the book. Then I quit the
program and start again to do the next test.

This celerons I use has never been certified by Intel to run in dual mode. It's
an experimental board. Maybe this has something to do with the strange output,
but this is not important in this debate.

>
>Personally, I don't think it is a big deal either way as we are not measuring
>hashing or anything else, just raw NPS.  If you restarted between the two
>runs, then your data belongs in the total.  I will try to re-read all the
>posts this afternoon and post a new summary.

Regards
Volker



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.