Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 15:39:26 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
>The point is that the result of list in Kurt unziker's tournament was achieved >by a book that it not list's book. > >I have nothing against the tournament and I read Kurt's post but the consequence >that there is evidence that list is the strongest amteur program >seems to be wrong. > Hello, Uri. It is very strange that you declare now that the decisive factor was the Book. You said that any program without almost evaluation could resolve the problems of the openings. How can you declare that the Book is the main factor. This is a contradiction on your previous declarations. Really amazing. Ionesco´s Theater would be very pleased with such kind of declarations!! Regards, Arturo Ochoa M. >Mogens larsen test List against the first division programs in fair >condition(every program use it's book and 2 games) >that means that list is using no book and list scored sligthly less than 50%. > Do you believe what you are saying now? You said that the Book is not important. How can you argue now? Interesting........ Arturo.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.