Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 03:02:19 08/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 1998 at 00:33:54, blass uri wrote:
>On August 13, 1998 at 12:22:24, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>[Event "1 x k6-1/350 40/120"]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "1998.??.??"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "ChessTiger 11.5"]
>>[Black "Junior5 beta 16bit"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[ECO "E15"]
>>[PlyCount "128"]
>>
>>{8192kB, jun-book.ctg
>>} 1. d4 {0} 1... Nf6 {2} 2. c4 {13} 2... e6 {1} 3. Nf3 {
>>8} 3... b6 {0} 4. g3 {8} 4... Ba6 {and tiger had to compute ... 0} 5. e3 {180}
>>5... Nc6 {-0.16/15 209}
>I think this move is a mistake(I prefer d5)
>
>I can use Junior5 as an analyzer(Infinite time) and as a player in game
>In my computer as a player(1000 seconds per move) Junior jumped from depth 12 to
>depth 15, did not like Bb7 and prefered 5...Nc6.
>Junior continued to analyse and in depth 16 Junior does another move 5...Be7
>
>As an analyzer Junior did not Jumped to depth 15 and discovered
>at depth 14 5...Bb7 is not the best move and prefered another move(5...Bd6)
>I did not like this move and Junior at depth 15 discovered as an analyzer
>5...Be7
>
>We can see that Junior did not understand this opening.
>I do not know what was Junior's losing mistake but I think after 5.e3 it was a
>good game of chesstiger
>
>A wise choice of tiger not to have a big book(If it had a big book it would not
>play 5.e3 and Junior would understand the opening better)
>
>Uri
It is not a wise choice!!!
It's just that I don't have enough time to enter a really big book, and that I
don't want to eat thousands of GM games without verifying each line!
Tiger's small book is often a problem, so I would prefer a bigger book, with
less holes, believe me.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.