Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 16:57:59 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 19:12:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 05, 2002 at 18:39:26, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>>The point is that the result of list in Kurt unziker's tournament was achieved >>>by a book that it not list's book. >>> >>>I have nothing against the tournament and I read Kurt's post but the consequence >>>that there is evidence that list is the strongest amteur program >>>seems to be wrong. >>> >> >>Hello, Uri. >> >>It is very strange that you declare now that the decisive factor was the Book. >> >>You said that any program without almost evaluation could resolve the problems >>of the openings. >> >>How can you declare that the Book is the main factor. >> >>This is a contradiction on your previous declarations. >> >>Really amazing. Ionesco´s Theater would be very pleased with such kind of >>declarations!! >> >>Regards, Arturo Ochoa M. >> >> >>>Mogens larsen test List against the first division programs in fair >>>condition(every program use it's book and 2 games) >>>that means that list is using no book and list scored sligthly less than 50%. >>> >> >>Do you believe what you are saying now? You said that the Book is not important. >> >>How can you argue now? >> >>Interesting........ >> >>Arturo. > >The fact that list could score sligthly less than 50% against the best free >programs suggest that book is relatively not important. > This is the problem: You only say: "I believe" "I think" "It seems" "It suggests" "relatively" That is a dumb because you don´t prove anything what it results very funny for me. You change your position in every message. You say now it is not important a book you said that List used a comercial book and it was very important. Really interesting...... >List is not a top engine and with book and pondering it can compete for the >title of the best amateur. > >Without them it is sligthly weaker. > Yes? But you said that List used a comercial book and it is the cause what List worn the Utzinger Tournament. Why don´t you keep your arguments consistently. This is my question and not responded. An amazed and fun Arturo :)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.