Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:59:28 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 18:51:39, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >Dual Itanium (not Itanium2, as I suspect I am under NDA): 1.95 clock speed for completeness??? > >Thanks, >Eugene > >On September 04, 2002 at 21:19:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>If anyone has the time, and a dual-cpu machine, would you run the following >>position to depth 13 using first one cpu, then restarting, and running it again >>with two processors? Everything else at default values. >> >>2r2rk1/1bqnbpp1/1p1ppn1p/pP6/N1P1P3/P2B1N1P/1B2QPP1/R2R2K1 b - - 0 1 >> >>That is kopec position 22, one of my favorites. I am only interested in >>two numbers, the raw NPS for 1 cpu, and the raw NPS for two cpus. I don't care >>about the times or anything, just the NPS... >> >>Please include your cpu/speed/vendor/etc... >> >>Vincent thinks that the 2-cpu test will slow way down in terms of NPS. I >>can't reproduce it on my machines here. Eugene can't reproduce it on Intel >>boxes, but the two AMD machines he has tried produce 1.4X the nps using two >>that it produces using 1, while my machines produce about 1.9X the nps... >> >>Thanks...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.