Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:00:13 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 19:17:10, Slater Wold wrote: >Could you set me up a telnet account on that machine? > >K, thanks! you are pretty stupid. Wouldn't you _really_ prefer an account on the itanium2 that he can't talk about? :) > >;) > >On September 05, 2002 at 18:51:39, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>Dual Itanium (not Itanium2, as I suspect I am under NDA): 1.95 >> >>Thanks, >>Eugene >> >>On September 04, 2002 at 21:19:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>If anyone has the time, and a dual-cpu machine, would you run the following >>>position to depth 13 using first one cpu, then restarting, and running it again >>>with two processors? Everything else at default values. >>> >>>2r2rk1/1bqnbpp1/1p1ppn1p/pP6/N1P1P3/P2B1N1P/1B2QPP1/R2R2K1 b - - 0 1 >>> >>>That is kopec position 22, one of my favorites. I am only interested in >>>two numbers, the raw NPS for 1 cpu, and the raw NPS for two cpus. I don't care >>>about the times or anything, just the NPS... >>> >>>Please include your cpu/speed/vendor/etc... >>> >>>Vincent thinks that the 2-cpu test will slow way down in terms of NPS. I >>>can't reproduce it on my machines here. Eugene can't reproduce it on Intel >>>boxes, but the two AMD machines he has tried produce 1.4X the nps using two >>>that it produces using 1, while my machines produce about 1.9X the nps... >>> >>>Thanks...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.