Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 17:03:27 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 19:05:48, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 05, 2002 at 18:35:06, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>>I do not think that engine that does not know to ponder and does not have book >>>is the strongest amateur program. >>> >> >>What a big change of mind in one week!!! >> >>You said about one week ago that a Book is not important. >> >>Now you are including it in the Engine as an element. >> >>Good contradiction, typical coming from you. >> >>Regards, Arturo Ochoa M. > >I did not say that it worth 0 elo and I did not mention only book. >I still believe that book is not important relatively to other things. > > Define "relatively" because this is an ambiguous term that doesnt say anything. >I do not say that it is impossible to do an engine that is better >than other engines with no book and no pondering but list is not clearly better >than other engines with book and based on the tournament of Kurt unzicker even >an old commercial program(Junior5) scores better than it. > >Today I find that the main problems of movei in the 3th division is the endgame >and not book and I used only a very small manual book. Really, you inserted the topic of your own chess program that is not the center of this debate. It is out of topic how could you do it in your engine. My question is how you can change your argumentes from posting to posting with saying only: I think, I believe, It seems, It suggests. It results too funny for me. > >You can download the games of the 3th division >in http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/ by clicking on 3th division. I am too busy with Diep now in order to see the games of another programs. By the way, Yace is the only "amateur" engine whose original game style is interesting for me. Regards, Arturo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.