Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 18:42:39 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 16:15:36, Bas Hamstra wrote: >On September 05, 2002 at 15:20:55, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 05, 2002 at 14:39:09, Roy Eassa wrote: >> >>>On September 05, 2002 at 07:03:21, Joachim Rang wrote: >>> >>>>On September 05, 2002 at 04:20:24, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>Just notice for everyone. Ridderkerk 1. division is ended: >>>>> >>>>>WBEC Ridderkerk, 1st Division - 2nd edition. >>>>>DUAL-P3-1266 2002.06.21 - 2002.09.03 >>>>>PONDER ON!! >>>>> Score >>>>>------------------------------------ >>>>> 1: Yace 0.99.56 50.0 / 76 >>>>> 2: Comet B.46 44.5 / 76 >>>>> 3: Gromit 3.8.2 44.0 / 76 >>>>> 4: Pharaon 2.62 44.0 / 76 >>>>> 5: Nejmet 3.06 43.5 / 76 >>>>> 6: Quark 1.76 43.5 / 76 >>>>> 7: Pepito 1.53 42.0 / 76 >>>>> 8: Little Goliath 3.5 40.5 / 76 >>>>> 9: Crafty 18.15 40.0 / 76 >>>>>10: AnMon 5.21 38.0 / 76 >>>>>11: SOS 99.11.03 37.5 / 76 >>>>>12: Amy 0.7 37.5 / 76 >>>>>13: GreenLightCh 2.18 37.0 / 76 >>>>>14: Amyan 1.531 34.0 / 76 >>>>>15: TheCrazyBishop 0045 33.5 / 76 >>>>>16: Phalanx XXII 32.5 / 76 >>>>>17: Francesca MAD 0.06 31.5 / 76 >>>>>18: Leila 0.53h 30.0 / 76 >>>>>19: King Of Kings 2.022 29.0 / 76 >>>>>20: Dragon 4.2.3 27.5 / 76 >>>>>------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>>Hmm... Yace still the strongest amateur!? Hasn't here been any progress in last >>>>>year really in the top? >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>> >>>> >>>>Aristarch 4.4 will beat Yace ;-) >>>> >>>>I', not sure, if Aristarch is the stongest Amateur (I doubt it), but at least >>>>against Yace it's a bit stronger. I did several Matches between Yace and >>>>Aristarch 4.4 and all ended with a slightly advantage for Ari. >>> >>> >>>"List" is not included in the above, either, and there's some evidence that it's >>>the strongest amateur program. >> >>I do not think that engine that does not know to ponder and does not have book >>is the strongest amateur program. >> >>Pondering and book is part of the program. >> >>Uri > >Why not? What counts is the result you get. BTW my guess is Ruffian is on top. >At FICS it was in the (standard) top-20 at a lousy P2-300. That's amazing. I >would estimate Crafty would have at best 2100 at that hardware. Ruffian is over >2400. I wouldn't be *that* impressed. I have checked on FICS, the hardware running is actually faster than listed... >Bas.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.