Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 21:09:12 09/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 23:12:00, Slater Wold wrote: [snip] >It *always* takes more nodes to solve a problem using more than 1 CPU, than it >does using just 1 CPU. That is very surprising. I suspect that a wider search will show that this does not always hold up. It would be pretty astonishing if it did. >It *always* takes less time to solve a problem using more than 1 CPU, than it >does using just 1 CPU. This seems like it should be true. >And that would be more/less what I am trying to "coorelate" here; Nodes To Solve >vs Time To Solve. What does solve mean? Do the programs always have identical depth (including fractional plies) and identical ce? If not then the searches are different and comparision is mostly guessing.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.