Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 01:34:35 09/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2002 at 21:42:39, Aaron Tay wrote: >On September 05, 2002 at 16:15:36, Bas Hamstra wrote: > >>On September 05, 2002 at 15:20:55, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On September 05, 2002 at 14:39:09, Roy Eassa wrote: >>> >>>>On September 05, 2002 at 07:03:21, Joachim Rang wrote: >>>> >>>>>On September 05, 2002 at 04:20:24, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Just notice for everyone. Ridderkerk 1. division is ended: >>>>>> >>>>>>WBEC Ridderkerk, 1st Division - 2nd edition. >>>>>>DUAL-P3-1266 2002.06.21 - 2002.09.03 >>>>>>PONDER ON!! >>>>>> Score >>>>>>------------------------------------ >>>>>> 1: Yace 0.99.56 50.0 / 76 >>>>>> 2: Comet B.46 44.5 / 76 >>>>>> 3: Gromit 3.8.2 44.0 / 76 >>>>>> 4: Pharaon 2.62 44.0 / 76 >>>>>> 5: Nejmet 3.06 43.5 / 76 >>>>>> 6: Quark 1.76 43.5 / 76 >>>>>> 7: Pepito 1.53 42.0 / 76 >>>>>> 8: Little Goliath 3.5 40.5 / 76 >>>>>> 9: Crafty 18.15 40.0 / 76 >>>>>>10: AnMon 5.21 38.0 / 76 >>>>>>11: SOS 99.11.03 37.5 / 76 >>>>>>12: Amy 0.7 37.5 / 76 >>>>>>13: GreenLightCh 2.18 37.0 / 76 >>>>>>14: Amyan 1.531 34.0 / 76 >>>>>>15: TheCrazyBishop 0045 33.5 / 76 >>>>>>16: Phalanx XXII 32.5 / 76 >>>>>>17: Francesca MAD 0.06 31.5 / 76 >>>>>>18: Leila 0.53h 30.0 / 76 >>>>>>19: King Of Kings 2.022 29.0 / 76 >>>>>>20: Dragon 4.2.3 27.5 / 76 >>>>>>------------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>>Hmm... Yace still the strongest amateur!? Hasn't here been any progress in last >>>>>>year really in the top? >>>>>> >>>>>>Jouni >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Aristarch 4.4 will beat Yace ;-) >>>>> >>>>>I', not sure, if Aristarch is the stongest Amateur (I doubt it), but at least >>>>>against Yace it's a bit stronger. I did several Matches between Yace and >>>>>Aristarch 4.4 and all ended with a slightly advantage for Ari. >>>> >>>> >>>>"List" is not included in the above, either, and there's some evidence that it's >>>>the strongest amateur program. >>> >>>I do not think that engine that does not know to ponder and does not have book >>>is the strongest amateur program. >>> >>>Pondering and book is part of the program. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Why not? What counts is the result you get. BTW my guess is Ruffian is on top. >>At FICS it was in the (standard) top-20 at a lousy P2-300. That's amazing. I >>would estimate Crafty would have at best 2100 at that hardware. Ruffian is over >>2400. > >I wouldn't be *that* impressed. I have checked on FICS, the hardware running is >actually faster than listed... That is truly disgusting. If there is something I hate it is lying about hardware. You got a new computer and do NOT take the 5 seconds to adjust your finger notes? Suddenly I am a lot less impressed by Ruffian. Best regards, Bas.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.