Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 05:31:32 09/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
>I believe that having big books is better for blitz because it may be more >important to save time in the clock and not to play the right moves. > This is a delicious breakfast dish. 1) I could use a random book of any elo player of 10Terabytes in blitz not imorting the selection of the games. Response: Prove it! >For longer time control only smaller book should be used to play in 0 seconds >and the big book can be used only as an advisor for extensions. 2) Tell this to Alexander Kure and Jeroen Noomen that has big books tunes for the respective engines and say to them that a random book has the same result. (I would like the expresion of Noomen, if he can read this mess supposition) 3) Maybe again, a random book of any source. Using Ionesco, I would recomend you a random book of computer games and the Small Book with openings like 1. f3 against the Kure book. Responce: Your theory will be deceived again. Maybe, an opening book with one lines is enough :)) I would like to say this to Alexander Kure or Jeroen Noomen, and they would be laughing for a long while. This the problem that I don´t care your posting , Uri. You don´t prove anything and I cannot take you serious. Regards, Arturo Ochoa M.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.