Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:13:51 09/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2002 at 00:01:54, Slater Wold wrote: >On September 05, 2002 at 20:00:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 05, 2002 at 19:17:10, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>Could you set me up a telnet account on that machine? >>> >>>K, thanks! >> >> >>you are pretty stupid. Wouldn't you _really_ prefer an account >>on the itanium2 that he can't talk about? >> >>:) > >LOL - Geez, don't hold back! > >I retract my statement and would like to have a telnet account on both please. >:) :) Just trying to make sure you don't let some of the rambling nonsense posted here cloud your good judgement. As I said, I've seen a few "sneak preview" numbers from Mckinley from someone inside Intel that will have to remain nameless since it is not so clear as to what can be said about them yet. Mckinley looks "hot" to me... multiple cpu machines will be nuclear... :) >> >> >>> >>>;) >>> >>>On September 05, 2002 at 18:51:39, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>> >>>>Dual Itanium (not Itanium2, as I suspect I am under NDA): 1.95 >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Eugene >>>> >>>>On September 04, 2002 at 21:19:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>If anyone has the time, and a dual-cpu machine, would you run the following >>>>>position to depth 13 using first one cpu, then restarting, and running it again >>>>>with two processors? Everything else at default values. >>>>> >>>>>2r2rk1/1bqnbpp1/1p1ppn1p/pP6/N1P1P3/P2B1N1P/1B2QPP1/R2R2K1 b - - 0 1 >>>>> >>>>>That is kopec position 22, one of my favorites. I am only interested in >>>>>two numbers, the raw NPS for 1 cpu, and the raw NPS for two cpus. I don't care >>>>>about the times or anything, just the NPS... >>>>> >>>>>Please include your cpu/speed/vendor/etc... >>>>> >>>>>Vincent thinks that the 2-cpu test will slow way down in terms of NPS. I >>>>>can't reproduce it on my machines here. Eugene can't reproduce it on Intel >>>>>boxes, but the two AMD machines he has tried produce 1.4X the nps using two >>>>>that it produces using 1, while my machines produce about 1.9X the nps... >>>>> >>>>>Thanks...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.