Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:53:13 09/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
I have posted the raw data logs, the "cooked data" that I extracted from the logs, and the speedup tables (those for Martin last nite). It might be interesting to take the cb.c program I also posted and change the speedup format to show 3 decimel places (I used 2 as Martin had suggested that would be better.) It would be interesting to run the program with 1, 2 and 3 decimel place accuracy, and let everyone look at the three tables and decide which one _really_ provides the most useful information. I'll bet everyone likes .1 better than .11 because is .01 really significant? Or is it just random noise? I will let someone else run this as I have supplied the raw data and program on my ftp machine. that way I can't be accused of biasing the results in any way. :)
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.