Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: interesting idea

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 08:53:13 09/06/02

Go up one level in this thread


I have posted the raw data logs, the "cooked data" that I extracted from the
logs, and the speedup tables (those for Martin last nite).  It might be
interesting to take the cb.c program I also posted and change the speedup
format to show 3 decimel places (I used 2 as Martin had suggested that would
be better.)

It would be interesting to run the program with 1, 2 and 3 decimel place
accuracy, and let everyone look at the three tables and decide which one
_really_ provides the most useful information.  I'll bet everyone likes
.1 better than .11 because is .01 really significant?  Or is it just random
noise?

I will let someone else run this as I have supplied the raw data and program
on my ftp machine.  that way I can't be accused of biasing the results in any
way.  :)



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.