Author: John Merlino
Date: 13:23:53 09/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2002 at 16:13:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 06, 2002 at 16:04:58, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >>From the Threads here I am assuming that professor Hyatt beleives that 100X >>factor in speed (NPS) would be too much to overcome with software improvement >>factor.I am proposing the following possible match:Time control 40/2 6 >>games : GNU chess 5.04 on a pentium 4 at 2.4 Gigahertz vs Chessmaster2 original >>playstation (33 Mhz).This is actually a 73 factor in terms of processor speed >>which is not 100 but close.On the original playstation Chessmaster2 gets about >>1100 Nps. > > >Why gnuchess? I don't know much about it, and it might be perfectly ok. > >But you are also misinterpreting what I said. I did say that a factor of >100x, between programs that are "close" is overwhelming. Obviously a bad >program at 100X will be better, but it might not be much better. > >In any case, give your test a go and see what happens first... If you want a program that is as close as possible to Chessmaster2 for the PSX, go with either Chessmaster 4000 or 5000. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.