Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 01:34:17 09/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2002 at 03:38:52, Lyn Harper wrote: > I know this is only a small sample, but it's a good result for CM9K. > CM8 is listed in SSDF as over 200 points lower than Fritz7, if I recall >correctly, and CM9 is only claimed to be 30 points higher than CM8, making it >roughly 180 points below Fritz7. So, based on those rating CM9 should only win >about 10% of games against F7. > I've got a beef with Australian Chess suppliers, who have'nt got CM9K in yet. It's 110 points according to the last list. CM8000 was only tested on K-6, so you can't compare it with Fritz 7 on Athlon 1200. ... 19 Fritz 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2625; 41-41; 294; 53%; 2604 ... 40 Chessmaster 8000 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2515; 44-45; 251; 45%; 2548 add 30 points = 80 points weaker, so we should expect a performance for CM9000 about 40%.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.