Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:42:25 09/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2002 at 04:40:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 06, 2002 at 21:23:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 06, 2002 at 18:57:50, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On September 06, 2002 at 18:48:01, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>> >>>>Actually, I generated all 3+3 and 4+2 pawnless tables but two; twose last two >>>>are being generated right now. >>> >>>I think that some of these are not interesting. >>>For example it seems clear that KQQQ vs KN is always a win for the stronger side >>>except cases when the position is a stalemate. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>Right, but you gotta have them to generate KPXX vs KX where X=anything... > >Only if you care about the exact number of moves. >You can have tablebases of distance to mate or conversion for KQQQ vs KN that is >not a stalemate. > >I agree that it is simpler to generate KQQQ vs KN than not generating it and >thinking how to change the source code of the move generator later. > >Uri should be tablebase generator and not move generator. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.