Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 11:30:27 09/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2002 at 04:02:44, Stuzzi Kadent wrote: >On September 06, 2002 at 18:50:27, John Merlino wrote: > >>On September 06, 2002 at 17:30:40, Lyn Harper wrote: >> >>> "Just about the only thing that isn't mentioned in the press release is the >>>time >>>control, which has not been decided yet." >>> >>> Does this mean the hardware *has* been mentioned? >> >>ummm...and the hardware.... >> >>I'll let you know as soon as I get the box, because we sure as HELL aren't going >>to use our fastest machine in the office, which is only a PIII-1GHz! >> >>jm > >I think the average computer of your users might be around that level, so it >would be a natural computer to use. Otherwise if the computer wins, people will >say "ah but the computer is so much faster than mine". If the fast computer >loses, you have to wait many months for a significant speed improvement. >Having said that, I would put a few dollars on a P4 2.0GHz being used. Because >it is current and not out of reach for most buyers. --------------- I would go with one of the top AMD processors! Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.