Author: Will Singleton
Date: 18:46:17 09/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2002 at 19:46:49, Peter McKenzie wrote: >I've been having a break from computer chess post WCCC, but have now started >going over some of Warp's games. First up is Warp's worst game, the loss vs >Brutus. In this game, Warp showed a total lack of understanding of its >centralised king in the early middlegame and lost without a fight. > >I present here the position after move 21 in the game. White has grabbed a pawn >thinking this position is OK, but in reality the white king is hopelessly stuck >in the centre. Also, white is passive, black is active and has a safe king, >therefore white is totally winning here: > >[D]r1r3k1/1p3ppp/b5q1/p7/4n3/P3PNB1/1P3PPP/1Q1RK2R b K - 0 1 > >I am curious what the static evaluation of various programs is here. The >version of warp used in Maastricht gives 0.238 in favour of white. Ideally the >static evaluation should favour black here I think. > >cheers, >Peter Mine gives 0.87 for white, static, and wants to play Qc6 with a 0.21 white edge. It doesn't know that castling is inhibited. Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.