Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 11:18:06 08/19/98
Go up one level in this thread
>1. I am sorry to read this. I suspected this might happen. Yup in Holland we say, if you never shoot you always miss. >2. Notwithstanding the past matters, I believe you should submit R10 to SSDF. >The position is non-ideal but on balance you have more to gain than you >have to >lose. Reasoning being: only being on the list with an older program will be a >-ve to those not familiar with the autotesting dilemma. It will not be >seen as >a -ve for those who are familiar with the issue (few hundreds) even if R10 on >the list does not reach #1. Absence of Rebel benefits another, rather. All >publicity is... Sorry, no Rebel10 on SSDF. >3. Of course I know that for many years Rebel is dedicated to maximising >strength vs humans. But for the coming 12-18 months (the R10 period, say) I >predict humans may not prove such a big problem for Rebel... Now Yotam, >Vadik... >;-) >Kind regards > >fca >PS: The "top" (not main) page of your website (under construction since August >12) has some interesting hyperlinks not yet enabled... Like exact timetable >for R10 DOS release... hint :-) When we know an exact date it will be published. For the moment I would say end next month beginning October. - Ed -
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.