Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Static Eval Test

Author: Peter McKenzie

Date: 12:33:16 09/08/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 08, 2002 at 13:08:33, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

<snip>>
>But the game is already over here.

Yes agreed.  In case you didn't read it, I said that already.
I will spell out my reasoning:
The point is that the program should be able to STATICALLY evaluate this type of
position as good for black in order to use search EARLIER in the game to avoid
this type of position.

>Don't know who made yor book, but no PC can
>find the necessary 12.e3. Rd2 is bull.

Rd2 is not best, but white is not lost after that move.  Of course it would be
nice if the book had something other than Rd2, but you can't ALWAYS rely on the
book to get you through the opening!

> You simply were outbooked in the game.

The book was a small factor, more important was how Warp played after book which
wasn't very good!  Brutus understood the position, Warp did not, therefore
Brutus won.

>You simply don't have the time to make such nonsense as Rd2. The black Bc4 is a
>known motif. Without book comps would be easy bully. How coul a comp calculate
>the later king safety??

Its not so hard, you can see from the replies that crafty, isichess and diep
have a reasonable idea.  Some other amateur programs aren't so good here.

If you continue to assume I am an idiot I won't bother replying to your posts
:-)

Peter

>
>Rolf Tueschen
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Gerd



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.