Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 12:38:16 09/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2002 at 13:03:00, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 07, 2002 at 19:46:49, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >black up 0.842 says DIEP. I don't follow your logics anyhow. Good eval from Diep, as expected. I am fixing my eval to say the something similar. >Black is totally won everywhere. Yes of course, I accidentally wrote the opposite. > >>I've been having a break from computer chess post WCCC, but have now started >>going over some of Warp's games. First up is Warp's worst game, the loss vs >>Brutus. In this game, Warp showed a total lack of understanding of its >>centralised king in the early middlegame and lost without a fight. >> >>I present here the position after move 21 in the game. White has grabbed a pawn >>thinking this position is OK, but in reality the white king is hopelessly stuck >>in the centre. Also, white is passive, black is active and has a safe king, >>therefore white is totally winning here: >> >>[D]r1r3k1/1p3ppp/b5q1/p7/4n3/P3PNB1/1P3PPP/1Q1RK2R b K - 0 1 >> >>I am curious what the static evaluation of various programs is here. The >>version of warp used in Maastricht gives 0.238 in favour of white. Ideally the >>static evaluation should favour black here I think. I got that right though :-) >> >>cheers, >>Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.