Author: Joseph Merolle
Date: 12:43:12 09/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2002 at 15:35:51, Joseph Merolle wrote: >I was grateful for the gramatical corections, that is why I posted a thank you, >however I did not feel conforatble when you concluded by advising me what I need >to do. >You mentions that men typically try to dominate people by reflecting their >status. If it is in your will to do so, I would be grateful to know is this your >opion, a nonequivalent-group design, quasi-experimental disign, or a simple >correlational design? Secondly,with your statement, " My english translation for >sensitive readers" a logical hypothesis to draw from this would also include >women to dominate by status of intelligence. >Lastly , If your interested in some alternitive ways of comminicationg the same >information that is less condescending and will not make people feel judged. >Feel free to study the folling. P.S. Your assuming I am male. > > > >"you need to use paragraphs and punctuation >more. The spelling did not matter." > >vs. > >You bring about some good points , however I included some corrections which I >hope serves to clarify your points. > > >Spelling did not matter. > > >vs. > > >Nothing at all! > > > >This statement makes one feel that he or she is under your evaluation. > > >my english translation for sensitive readers > >vs. > > >This is another statement that is not needed unless you want to imply that the >person is speaking another language, which is condescending. > > >Regards > >J > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On September 08, 2002 at 13:47:12, Stuzzi Kadent wrote: >>On September 08, 2002 at 12:48:48, Joseph Merolle wrote: >> >>>Albert Elis the father of Rational emotional therapy would characterize your " >>>you need " statement as irrational and would identify you as controling. Just >>>something I learned with my masters dagree while leaning english (my third >>>Language), however since completing my 2nd PhD in Psychotherapy I could have >>>forgot somthing. However, please if you have a need to teach me something in >>>punctuation go right ahead I dont want to stop you working out some issues. >>> >>>Regards >>> >>>Ph.D. M.D JAMerolle >>> >>>On September 08, 2002 at 12:10:17, Stuzzi Kadent wrote: >>> >>>>On September 08, 2002 at 08:42:08, Joseph Merolle wrote: >>>> >>>>>Thanks you so much english getting better! I will work on it >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Regards >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On September 08, 2002 at 04:08:13, Stuzzi Kadent wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>John, unless Chessmaster has the features that Fritz has in the analysis suite >>>>>>( Full Analysis ,blunder check, compare analysis , deep position analysis and >>>>>>shootout) it will never be better!!! >>>>>>I know just what you're going to say: we have similar features that do the same >>>>>>thing. Bull, Chessmaster's idea of analysis is telling you what is going on in a >>>>>>game, i.e. bishop blocks the check (what a joke), instead of telling you what >>>>>>you did wrong with an alternative line of play, automatically computing the line >>>>>>in the notation window with the option of playing through it. CM does have a >>>>>>nice feature with audio advice, but give me a break, should I do this for every >>>>>>move of the game if I want an alternative line for every move? Moreover with >>>>>>audio advice you don't have the option of getting the new line of play in the >>>>>>notation window to save and scroll though it, unless you do it manually. >>>>>>CM might be the most popular program but it will never be the most popular >>>>>>program with serious club players unless these features are offered like they >>>>>>are in Fritz! However, if CM had these features I would be sold, but until then >>>>>>I will stick with Fritz! CMs idea of making a program better is putting in more >>>>>>tutorials and this won't cut it. If Ubisoft is really interested in making >>>>>>a better program for 10,000 I would take these ideas to the drawing board. Or, >>>>>>you can put in another 50 min of Josh and call it a new program (what a joke). >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>with help from Stuzzi "Punctuations are your friends" Kadent >>>> >>>>Did not mean to cause offence, but you need to use paragraphs and punctuation >>>>more. The spelling did not matter. >> >>You don't seem to realise how difficult what you wrote was to read. Which is why >>you had no other responses. However, the need to feel clever and dominate people >>by pointing to status like you do is very common in males. Goodbye.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.