Author: Angrim
Date: 13:34:08 09/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2002 at 16:05:12, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On September 08, 2002 at 13:32:31, Olaf Jenkner wrote: > >>Distributed generation will not work. > >A simple idea, that should work is for TBs with pawns. Say KRPKNN. One could >divide this into 48 to KRP(a2)KNN until KRP(h7)KNN. The a7-h7 tables are >independent of each other, and could be generated in parallel (on different >computers). When those are finished, the tables with the pawns on 6th rank can >be generated. That second task would in some sense even be easier, because much >less "conversion tables" are needed. And so on. So, essentially, each single >task, is very comparable to the task of generating a 5-men table. > >Regards, >Dieter This is a nice practical idea. If I were building 6pc tables currently I might use it. Something similar could be done for pawnless tables, allowing each sub-table to be less than 2^32 entries, a quite nice feature when working on a 32bit machine. Angrim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.