Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 14:27:59 09/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2002 at 17:00:40, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 08, 2002 at 16:09:37, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On September 08, 2002 at 13:39:00, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On September 08, 2002 at 12:56:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On September 07, 2002 at 18:41:54, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>> >>>>Isn't it time for you to get looked after in a hospital? >>>>The notes and actions of this very hated beetle guy (my >>>>whole team is censored by the guy, simply because they once >>>>beated him) are such that if you do not get censored by him >>>>you suck as a chessplayer :) >>>> >>> >>>Ok, now everbody knows how big your problems are, maturity, character, >>>personality, to begin with. No wonder that you behaved in the ugly manner in the >>>attack thread on CTS paper. At first I defended you as a young guy. But now I >>>know how much you lack of decent education and natural talents for logical >>>reasoning. Perhaps it's your good chess (in the CC scene) that made you going >>>all dreamy. In fact you don't know what you are talking about. I explain. >>> >>>Yes, objectively it's very strange when you and your team are censored for >>>nothing but beating this man. I repeat, if that satisfies you, you are right so >>>far. >>> >>>But now the information why you are such a mean! >>> >>>Can't you understand tht this man is no longer IM in strength but he still >>>enjoys his title and the games? I'm sure he knows that he's no longer that >>>strong. For reasons unknown he hasn't found a way to organize his life (chess) >>>so that he could play like a normal "weak" player. That is also the reason why >>>he doesn't like the "thank you" after the game. For him - this is like joking, >>>because I repeat he knows that he's much weaker. Now it seems as if he tried to >>>evitate players who play him just to beat him - as the IM! All this is just a >>>theory after the important information of Bob that he suffered a stroke with >>>influences on speech and whatelse. >> >>I do not know a single person in my team who writes 'thank you' after >>winning a game. Only in USA that seems to be the habit. You just thank >>your opponent when he quickly resigns. note that beetle isn't doing this. >>He plays on and on in order to say you suck though he is outclassed :) > >It is also possible to say thank you also after losing a game because you >learned from the game to play better. > >Usually players say nothing after winning a game but >I remember more than one case when a player apologized for winning a game. > >> >>You again go write personal bullshit here. I will ignore you after this >>writing. You obviously are the guy to go back to hospital again. How >>the hell did they release you from prison this time, or is there this time >>possibility to go to the internet from prison? > >I do not see why you need to talk so much about this guy. > >The fact that his behaviour can be explained by the fact that he suffered a >stroke does not mean that his behaviour is a reason to go to prison or to >hospital. > >Uri It would be more exact if you would make conclusions about his tendency to misbehave. Calling Bob mass fraud, lying, cheat without apology after being proven wrong and now using vocabulary like prison (criminals sit in prison, but not members of CCC) or hospital is _not_ a question of outside reasons or how someone explained a medical stroke. This is a question of respect for the charta of this forum CCC of the individual Vincent. I'm surprised by the many insults here. Calling Mike Valvo names after his stroke is outrageous misbehaviour. And this passes here without official reaction. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.