Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 15:53:43 09/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2002 at 18:16:18, Omid David wrote: >On September 08, 2002 at 13:23:22, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On September 07, 2002 at 12:58:59, Omid David wrote: >> >>> >>>>JICCA is the journal of a private association. Official for CC but not >>>>official in the sense that a member of a university had to fear something. >>> >>>I'm not sure... Officially speaking, the value of an article published in ICCA >>>journal, is by no means considered inferior to another one published in any >>>other academic journal. >>> >>>That is, ICCA is considered an academic journal, but more domain specific (Now >>>after becoming ICGA, it deals with even wider domains). >>> >>>Omid. >> >>I do not know how it works in other countries, but in netherlands >>a part of the payment of departments is based upon the number >>of publications in reviewed magazines like ICGA/ICCA. > >That's also the way it works in Israel. And for that mean, publishing an article >in ICCA or any other reviewed journal is fine. I get impression it might work different in USA. Anyway my opinion is that a scientist who is removing a factor 2 in his articles where a few % matter, is not worth to be called a scientist. He's someone we call 'uitvreter' here after the famous book from the start 1920s. I am not sure there is equivalent word for it in foreign languages. >> >>Best regards, >>Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.